![]() ![]() Parties with the potential to become massive and majoritarian gave up the goal of victory by keeping out an electoral clientele of working-class women and perhaps male sympathizers who saw that domination-whether economic or gender-was domination no matter what the form. The Pity of War, BBC Two, review Niall Fergusons rebuttal of Max Hastings argument in his BBC Two documentary is eloquently expressed but ultimately unconvincing, says Nigel Jones By. The situation became even worse as these parties bureaucratized in the interwar years and devoted themselves to guarding entrenched positions for well-paid functionaries. According to Niall Ferguson, England entered into war based on naive assumptions of German aims, thereby transforming a Continental conflict into a world war, which it then badly mishandled, necessitating American. address economic issues that would have benefited women workers, or to concern themselves with what they saw as women's insignificant problems. The Pity of War makes a simple and provocative argument: the human atrocity known as the Great War was entirely England’s fault. Under the banner of class solidarity, the various European parties generally refused to bring in women on equal terms to men, to. This excellent collection of articles on interwar socialism shows the bottom line of socialist political theory: The vast majority of party leaders utterly refused to surrender the male bonus of political and economic privilege-even if it meant losing political wars. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |